Navigation
Industry
Other Reports
 
Advanced Technologies for Municipal Water Treatment
US water treatment report
  
Report

Advanced Technologies for Municipal Water Treatment (US water treatment report)Advanced Technologies for Municipal Water Treatment. Driven by diminishing water supplies, regulatory and consumer demand for improved water quality, and an aging infrastructure, advanced technologies for municipal drinking water treatment are a growing U.S. market.

From
$3850
Overview |
More publications
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

XVI

  • STUDY GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

XVI

  • REASONS FOR DOING THE STUDY

XVI

  • CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE STUDY AND FOR WHOM

XVII

  • SCOPE AND FORMAT

XVII

  • METHODOLOGY

XVII

  • INFORMATION SOURCES

XVII

  • RELATED BCC WORK CREDENTIALS

XVIII

  • BCC ONLINE SERVICE

XVIII

  • INTERNET

XVIII

  • AUTHOR'S CREDENTIALS

XIX

  • DISCLAIMER

XIX

SUMMARY

XX

Summary Table:
VALUE OF THE U.S. MARKET FOR ADVANCED MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENTS TECHNOLOGIES, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

XXI

Summary Figure:
VALUE OF THE U.S. MARKET FOR ADVANCED MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENTS TECHNOLOGIES, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

XXI

OVERVIEW

1

  • MARKET FORCES

1

  • QUANTITY

1

  • QUALITY

1

  • AGING INFRASTRUCTURE

1

  • CONGRESSIONAL SPENDING

2

    • EPA Gap Analysis

2

    • WIN Proposes Increased Federal Funding

3

  • UTILITIES' PLANS FOR PLANT UPGRADES

3

  • WATER AVAILABILITY AND USAGE IN THE U.S.

4

  • PUBLIC SUPPLY

4

Table 1 DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC SUPPLY WATER BY USE

4

Figure 1 DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC SUPPLY WATER BY USE (%)

5

  • THE PRICE OF IMPROVED WATER QUALITY

5

  • HISTORY OF DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

5

Table 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

6

Table 2 (CONTINUED)

7

  • OVERVIEW OF ADVANCED MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

7

  • EPA SPENDING FORECASTS

7

Table 3 INVESTMENT NEEDED FOR WATER TREATMENT BY CONTAMINANT ($ BILLIONS)

8

Figure 2 INVESTMENT NEEDED FOR WATER TREATMENT BY CONTAMINANT (%)

8

  • ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION

9

Table 4 ETV DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATIONS

9

Table 4 (CONTINUED)

10

  • DRINKING WATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS

11

    • Particle Filtration

11

    • Disinfection

11

    • Disinfection Byproducts

12

      • Trihalomethanes

12

      • Haloacetic Acids

12

    • Alternate Forms of Chlorine

12

    • Alternatives to Chlorine

13

      • Ozone

13

      • Ultraviolet Light

13

Table 5 COMPARISON OF DISINFECTION METHODS

13

      • Membrane Filtration

14

  • CONTINUED RELIANCE ON CHLORINE

14

Table 6 DISINFECTION METHODS USED BY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS

14

Figure 3 DISINFECTION METHODS USED BY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS (%)

15

Table 7 FORMS OF CHLORINE USED AT DRINKING WATER PLANTS (%)

15

Figure 4 FORMS OF CHLORINE USED AT WATER TREATMENT PLANTS (%)

16

  • THE MULTI-BARRIER APPROACH

16

  • REGULATORY CLIMATE

17

  • SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT

17

Table 8 NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS

18

Table 8 (CONTINUED)

19

Table 8 (CONTINUED)

20

Table 8 (CONTINUED)

21

Table 9 NATIONAL SECONDARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS

21

Table 9 (CONTINUED)

22

    • Statutory Requirements of the SDWA, through 2005

22

Table 10 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1996

22

    • Arsenic

22

      • Small System Compliance

23

    • Cryptosporidium

24

    • Groundwater Rule

24

    • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidates

25

Table 11 THE DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST

25

Table 11 (CONTINUED)

26

    • Emerging Pathogens

27

      • Adenoviruses

27

      • Caliciviruses

27

      • Coxsackieviruses

27

      • Echoviruses

27

      • Helicobacter pylori

28

      • Aeromonas hydrophila

28

      • Mycobacterium avium complex

28

      • Microsporidia

29

    • Emerging Inorganic Contaminants

29

      • Perchlorate

29

    • Emerging Organic Contaminants

30

      • MTBE

30

    • Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals and Other Organic Contaminants

30

INDUSTRY STRUCTURE

31

  • THE URGE TO MERGE

31

  • WHY MERGE?

31

Table 12 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN THE WATER TREATMENT INDUSTRY (SINCE 1996)

32

  • ENGINEERING FIRMS ACTIVE IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT

32

  • TOP ENGINEERING FIRMS IN WATER

33

Table 13 ENGINEERING FIRMS INVOLVED IN WATER SUPPLY AND SALES, 2001 ($ MILLIONS)

33

Table 13 (CONTINUED)

34

    • Earth Tech

34

    • Black & Veatch

34

    • Montgomery Watson Harza

35

    • CH2M Hill

36

    • Camp Dresser & McKee

37

    • AECOM Technology

38

    • URS Corp.

38

    • Malcolm Pirnie

38

    • Tetra Tech

39

    • Henningson, Durham and Richardson (HDR)

40

    • PBS&J

40

    • The Dewberry Companies

40

    • Dewberry-Goodkind, Inc.

41

    • Dewberry & Davis, Inc.

41

    • Jacobs Engineering Group

41

    • Carollo Engineers

41

    • CSA Group

42

    • Parsons Corp.

43

    • Hazen and Sawyer

43

    • Boyle Engineering

43

    • Gannett Fleming

44

    • Michael Baker Corp.

44

  • PATENT TRENDS

44

  • BY TECHNOLOGY

45

Table 14 PATENTS INVOLVING ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES (OCTOBER 22, 2000 TO OCTOBER 22, 2002)

45

Table 14 (CONTINUED)

46

Table 14 (CONTINUED)

47

Figure 5 PATENTS BY TECHNOLOGY (%)

48

  • BY COMPANY

48

Figure 6 PATENTS BY COMPANY, OCTOBER 22, 2000 TO OCTOBER 22, 2002 (%)

49

  • MEMBRANE FILTRATION

50

  • MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH

50

    • Market Size and Growth (Continued)

51

Table 15 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. MEMBRANE FILTRATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

52

Figure 7 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. MEMBRANE FILTRATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

53

  • OVERVIEW

53

    • Rejected Contaminants

53

    • Membrane Configurations

54

    • Flux

54

    • Other Process Parameters

54

    • Modes of Filtration

54

    • Membrane Fouling

55

    • Filtration Processes

55

Table 16 CAPACITY OF MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY BY PROCESS, INSTALLED AND PROPOSED PROJECTS, 2002 (%)

55

Figure 8 INSTALLED CAPACITY OF MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY BY PROCESS, INSTALLED AND PROPOSED PROJECTS, 2002 (%)

56

Figure 9 COMPARISON OF MEMBRANE PROCESSES

56

  • REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO)

57

    • RO Membranes

57

    • Membrane Cost

57

    • UF as RO Pretreatment

58

    • MF as RO Pretreatment

58

    • Advantages and Disadvantages

58

    • Advantages

58

    • Disadvantages

59

    • Brine

59

    • Manufacturers and Products

59

Table 17 RO MEMBRANE PRODUCTS

60

    • Installed Capacity

61

Table 18 FULL SCALE RO DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

61

Table 18 (CONTINUED)

62

Table 18 (CONTINUED)

63

Table 18 (CONTINUED)

64

Table 18 (CONTINUED)

65

Table 18 (CONTINUED)

66

  • ELECTRODIALYSIS REVERSAL (EDR)

66

    • Advantages and Disadvantages

67

    • Advantages

67

    • Disadvantages

67

    • EDR Membranes/Systems

67

    • Installed Capacity

68

Table 19 FULL-SCALE EDR DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S.

68

Table 19 (CONTINUED)

69

  • MF

69

    • Advantages and Disadvantages

70

    • Advantages

70

    • Disadvantages

70

    • MF Membranes/Systems

71

Table 20 MF PRODUCTS

71

    • Installed Capacity

71

Table 21 FULL-SCALE MF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

71

Table 21 (CONTINUED)

72

Table 21 (CONTINUED)

73

  • UF

73

    • UF Membranes/Systems

74

Table 22 UF PRODUCTS

74

    • Installed Capacity

74

Table 23 FULL-SCALE UF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

75

  • NANOFILTERS (NF)

76

    • NF Membranes/Systems

76

Table 24 NF MEMBRANE PRODUCTS

76

Table 24 (CONTINUED)

77

    • Installed Capacity

77

Table 25 FULL-SCALE NF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

77

Table 25 (CONTINUED)

78

  • COST, EFFECTIVENESS OF MEMBRANE FILTRATION

78

Table 26 TYPICAL MEMBRANE SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD SYSTEM)

79

  • INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS

79

Table 27 COMPANIES SELLING MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

79

    • Pall Corp.

80

    • Asahi Kasei

80

    • Microza

80

Table 28 ASAHI MICROZA ELEMENTS

81

    • Dow Liquid Separations/Filmtec

81

    • Koch Membrane Systems

82

    • RO Elements

82

    • UF Elements

83

    • NF Elements

83

Table 29 KOCH NF PRODUCTS

83

    • Osmonics

84

    • RO Membrane Elements

84

Table 30 OSMONICS DESAL SERIES A

84

Table 31 OSMONICS' CA DESAL ELEMENTS

85

    • NF Membrane Elements

86

    • MUNI Packaged Systems

86

Table 32 OSMONICS MUNI SYSTEMS

86

Table 33 INSTALLED OSMONICS' MUNI RO/NF PLANTS

87

    • Ionics/Norit

87

    • Norit UF Technology

88

    • Hydranautics/Nitto Denko

89

    • RO Membrane Elements

89

    • NF Membrane Elements

89

    • HYDRAcap

89

    • USFilter

90

    • USFilter/Memcor

91

    • Aquasource/Ondeo

91

    • TriSep

92

    • Spiral Wound Backflushable UF Element

92

    • Toray Industries

93

    • Zenon Environmental

93

    • ZeeWeed

93

    • PCI Membranes

94

  • MARKET SHARE

95

Table 34 MEMBRANE FILTRATION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002

95

Figure 10 MEMBRANE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

96

  • OZONE

96

  • MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH

96

Table 35 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. OZONE DISINFECTION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

97

Figure 11 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. OZONE DISINFECTION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

97

  • OVERVIEW

98

    • Mechanisms of Ozone Disinfection

98

    • Other Contaminants Oxidized

98

    • Generating O3

99

    • Dispersing the Gas

99

    • Ozone with Hydrogen Peroxide

100

  • DRAWBACKS AND BENEFITS

100

    • Advantages

100

    • Disadvantages

100

    • Bromate

101

  • INSTALLED CAPACITY

101

Table 36 U.S. OZONE INSTALLATIONS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)

101

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

102

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

103

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

104

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

105

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

106

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

107

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

108

Table 36 (CONTINUED)

109

  • COST, EFFECTIVENESS OF OZONE TREAMENT

109

Table 37 TYPICAL OZONE SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD INSTALLATION)

110

  • INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS

110

    • PCI-WEDECO

110

    • Effizon Technology

111

    • GSO/GSA Series

111

Table 38 PCI-WEDECO GSO/GSA SERIES GENERATORS

112

    • SMO/SMA Series

112

Table 39 PCI-WEDECO SMO/SMA SERIES GENERATORS

112

    • PDO/PDA Series

113

    • Ozonia

113

    • OZAT Packaged Plants

113

Table 40 OZAT OZONE PLANT SPECS

114

    • OZAT Skids

114

Table 41 SPECIFICATIONS FOR OZAT SKIDS

114

Table 41 (CONTINUED)

115

    • Engineered AT Systems

115

    • Praxair Trailigaz

115

    • Osmonics

116

    • HC Series Ozone Generators

116

Table 42 OSMONICS HC SERIES OZONE GENERATORS

117

    • USFilter

117

  • MARKET SHARE

118

Table 43 OZONE DISINFECTION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002

118

Figure 12 OZONE DISINFECTION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

118

  • ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT

118

  • MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH

118

Table 44 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. UV RADIATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

119

Figure 13 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. UV RADIATION IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

120

  • OVERVIEW

120

    • UV Lamps

121

    • Reactor Types

121

    • Advantages and Disadvantages

121

    • Advantages

121

    • Disadvantages

122

  • UV EQUIPMENT

122

Table 45 UV MANUFACTURERS AND PRODUCTS

122

  • INSTALLED CAPACITY

123

Table 46 U.S. UV DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)

123

  • COST, EFFECTIVENESS OF UV IRRADIATION

123

Table 47 TYPICAL UV SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD INSTALLATION)

124

  • INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS

124

    • Trojan Technologies

124

    • UVSwift System

125

    • UVLogic System

125

Table 48 UVLOGIC SYSTEM SPECS

125

Table 48 (CONTINUED)

126

    • UV8000 System

126

    • WEDECO-Ideal Horizons

127

    • Spektrotherm Lamps

127

    • B-Series

127

Table 49 WEDECO B-SERIES UV SYSTEMS

128

    • K-Series

128

Table 50 WEDECO K SERIES SYSTEMS

128

    • Aquionics

129

    • Calgon Carbon Corp.

129

    • Sentinel System

130

    • Rayox System

130

    • Severn Trent/UltraDynamics

131

    • UltraDynamics Equipment

131

Table 51 ULTRADYNAMICS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS

132

    • Severn Trent/Hanovia

132

    • FrontLine

132

    • Pulsar UV Technologies

133

    • Ondeo Degrement

133

    • Wallace & Tiernan/USFilter

134

Table 52 BARRIER UV SYSTEM SPECS

134

    • Lightstream Technologies

134

  • MARKET SHARE

135

Table 53 U.S. UV DISINFECTION MARKET PRECENTAGE SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002

135

Figure 14 U.S. UV DISINFECTION MARKET PERCENTRAGE SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

136

  • NOVEL TREATMENTS

136

  • MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH

136

    • Market Size and Growth (Continued)

137

Table 54 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR U.S. NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

138

Figure 15 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR U.S. NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

138

  • OVERVIEW

138

    • Hypochlorites

139

    • Chloramines

139

Table 55 PLANTS DISINFECTING WITH CHLORAMINE

140

    • Chlorine Dioxide

140

    • Chlorite/Chlorate

140

    • NDMA

141

    • On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite Generation

141

    • Disinfection with Chloramine

142

    • On-Site Chlorine Dioxide Production

142

    • Mixed Oxidant Disinfection

142

  • COST, EFFECTIVENESS OF NOVEL TREATMENTS

143

Table 56 ADVANCED OXIDIZING AGENTS COMPARED (TYPICAL 10-MGD PLANT)

143

  • INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS

144

    • Wallace & Tiernan

144

    • Chlorine Dioxide System

144

    • Direct-Feed Ammoniator

144

    • Ionics

145

Table 57 CLOROMAT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS

145

    • Severn Trent/ClorTec

146

    • ClorTec Systems

146

    • Severn Trent/Biochem

146

    • Sterling Pulp Chemicals

147

    • ERCO R101 Generator

147

    • CDG Technology

148

    • Gas:Solid System

148

    • OXI Company

148

    • OXI-2B

149

    • MIOX Corp

149

Table 58 MIOX MIXED OXIDANT DISINFECTION INSTALLATIONS

150

    • Electrolytic Technologies

150

Table 59 KLORIGEN SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS

151

  • INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS

151

Figure 16 WORLD ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER

152

  • WORLD ACCESS TO WATER

152

  • WORLD BANK WATER PROJECTS

153

  • WWEMA FORECASTS

153

  • DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PROJECTIONS

153

    • AWWA Inks Trade Pact

154

    • Water/Wastewater Markets of 12 "Best Prospect" Countries

154

Table 60 WATER/WASTEWATER MARKETS OF 12 "BEST PROSPECT" COUNTRIES

154

    • Australia

155

    • China

155

    • Egypt

155

    • India

156

    • Japan

156

    • Mexico

157

    • South Korea

157

    • Saudi Arabia

158

    • Spain

158

    • Taiwan

158

    • United Kingdom

159

  • EXPENDITURES FOR POTABLE WATER TREATMENT

159

Table 61 U.S. EXPORTS OF POTABLE WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT ($ MILLIONS, 1999)

160

  • MAJOR PLAYERS IN GLOBAL WATER TREATMENT

160

    • Major Players in Global Water Treatment (Continued)

161

MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY

162

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

163

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

164

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

165

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

166

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

167

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

168

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

169

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

170

  • MANUFACTURERS DIRECTORY (CONTINUED)

171

GLOSSARY

172

  • GLOSSARY (CONTINUED)

173
? ?

LIST OF TABLES

 ?

Summary Table:
VALUE OF THE U.S. MARKET FOR ADVANCED MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENTS TECHNOLOGIES, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

XXI

Table 1 DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC SUPPLY WATER BY USE

4

Table 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

6

Table 3 INVESTMENT NEEDED FOR WATER TREATMENT BY CONTAMINANT ($ BILLIONS)

8

Table 4 ETV DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATIONS

9

Table 5 COMPARISON OF DISINFECTION METHODS

13

Table 6 DISINFECTION METHODS USED BY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS

14

Table 7 FORMS OF CHLORINE USED AT DRINKING WATER PLANTS (%)

15

Table 8 NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS

18

Table 9 NATIONAL SECONDARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS

21

Table 10 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1996

22

Table 11 THE DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST

25

Table 12 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN THE WATER TREATMENT INDUSTRY (SINCE 1996)

32

Table 13 ENGINEERING FIRMS INVOLVED IN WATER SUPPLY AND SALES, 2001 ($ MILLIONS)

33

Table 14 PATENTS INVOLVING ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES (OCTOBER 22, 2000 TO OCTOBER 22, 2002)

45

Table 15 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. MEMBRANE FILTRATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

52

Table 16 CAPACITY OF MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY BY PROCESS (INSTALLED AND PROPOSED PROJECTS, 2002) (%)

55

Table 17 RO MEMBRANE PRODUCTS

60

Table 18 FULL SCALE RO DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

61

Table 19 FULL-SCALE EDR DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S.

68

Table 20 MF PRODUCTS

71

Table 21 FULL-SCALE MF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

71

Table 22 UF PRODUCTS

74

Table 23 FULL-SCALE UF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

75

Table 24 NF MEMBRANE PRODUCTS

76

Table 25 FULL-SCALE NF DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS IN THE U.S. (COMPLETED AND PROPOSED, 2002)

77

Table 26 TYPICAL MEMBRANE SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD SYSTEM)

79

Table 27 COMPANIES SELLING MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR DRINKING WATER TREATMENT

79

Table 28 ASAHI MICROZA ELEMENTS

81

Table 29 KOCH NF PRODUCTS

83

Table 30 OSMONICS DESAL SERIES A

84

Table 31 OSMONICS' CA DESAL ELEMENTS

85

Table 32 OSMONICS MUNI SYSTEMS

86

Table 33 INSTALLED OSMONICS' MUNI RO/NF PLANTS

87

Table 34 MEMBRANE FILTRATION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002

95

Table 35 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. OZONE DISINFECTION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

97

Table 36 U.S. OZONE INSTALLATIONS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)

101

Table 37 TYPICAL OZONE SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD INSTALLATION)

110

Table 38 PCI-WEDECO GSO/GSA SERIES GENERATORS

112

Table 39 PCI-WEDECO SMO/SMA SERIES GENERATORS

112

Table 40 OZAT OZONE PLANT SPECS

114

Table 41 SPECIFICATIONS FOR OZAT SKIDS

114

Table 42 OSMONICS HC SERIES OZONE GENERATORS

117

Table 43 OZONE DISINFECTION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002

118

Table 44 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. UV RADIATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

119

Table 45 UV MANUFACTURERS AND PRODUCTS

122

Table 46 U.S. UV DRINKING WATER INSTALLATIONS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)

123

Table 47 TYPICAL UV SYSTEM SPECS (10-MGD INSTALLATION)

124

Table 48 UVLOGIC SYSTEM SPECS

125

Table 49 WEDECO B-SERIES UV SYSTEMS

128

Table 50 WEDECO K SERIES SYSTEMS

128

Table 51 ULTRADYNAMICS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS

132

Table 52 BARRIER UV SYSTEM SPECS

134

Table 53 U.S. UV DISINFECTION MARKET PRECENTAGE SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002

135

Table 54 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR U.S. NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)

138

Table 55 PLANTS DISINFECTING WITH CHLORAMINE

140

Table 56 ADVANCED OXIDIZING AGENTS COMPARED (TYPICAL 10-MGD PLANT)

143

Table 57 CLOROMAT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS

145

Table 58 MIOX MIXED OXIDANT DISINFECTION INSTALLATIONS

150

Table 59 KLORIGEN SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS

151

Table 60 WATER/WASTEWATER MARKETS OF 12 "BEST PROSPECT" COUNTRIES

154

Table 61 U.S. EXPORTS OF POTABLE WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT ($ MILLIONS, 1999)

160
? ?

LIST OF FIGURES

 ?

Summary Figure:
VALUE OF THE U.S. MARKET FOR ADVANCED MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENTS TECHNOLOGIES, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

XXI

Figure 1 DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC SUPPLY WATER BY USE (%)

5

Figure 2 INVESTMENT NEEDED FOR WATER TREATMENT BY CONTAMINANT (%)

8

Figure 3 DISINFECTION METHODS USED BY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS (%)

15

Figure 4 FORMS OF CHLORINE USED AT WATER TREATMENT PLANTS (%)

16

Figure 5 PATENTS BY TECHNOLOGY (%)

48

Figure 6 PATENTS BY COMPANY, OCTOBER 22, 2000 TO OCTOBER 22, 2002 (%)

49

Figure 7 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. MEMBRANE FILTRATION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

53

Figure 8 INSTALLED CAPACITY OF MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY BY PROCESS, INSTALLED AND PROPOSED PROJECTS, 2002 (%)

56

Figure 9 COMPARISON OF MEMBRANE PROCESSES

56

Figure 10 MEMBRANE MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

96

Figure 11 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. OZONE DISINFECTION MARKET IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

97

Figure 12 OZONE DISINFECTION PERCENTAGE MARKET SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

118

Figure 13 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR THE U.S. UV RADIATION IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

120

Figure 14 U.S. UV DISINFECTION MARKET PERCENTRAGE SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2002 (%)

136

Figure 15 SALES AND PROJECTIONS FOR U.S. NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES IN MUNICIPAL WATER TREATMENT, 2000-2008 ($ MILLIONS)

138

Figure 16 WORLD ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER

152
Report Details:
Publisher:
bccresearch
Type:
Market Study - June 2003
 
 
 
Copyright © Chiltern Magazine Services Ltd | Email: admin@cmsinfo.com | Tel: +(1) 508 861 0401